| I have some suggestions to the designer: the game is playable in medium quality but ... the boot texts are too small, the visual quality is too heavy to run, it has too many loading screens and needless to say, the modules. I know that there are companies that have dedicated departments for that, but compared to other games, I have seen games that consume less resources and equal, even exceed graphic quality. Sometimes It is not necessary to be so thorough with the visual details, if you are looking for quality in the performance. 5 stars I would only give 2.5. (Take as a reference a certain game called "Oblivion". With 768 mb it had an unbeatable graphic quality for pc's whose standard was hardly 2 gb). I don't justify 1gb for such slow development, and define it just as "acceptable". Much performance improvement is needed. |
4 years ago(-1)
T
Thanks for replying, hopefully as well as taking the time to reply you can correct the program errors. On this same page I have tried other games with superior graphic qualities and they do not have such poor performance. But let's see the evidence, do you think? My pc's characteristics are: CPU, Intel core i7, Graphics: Nvidia Geforce GTX (8 gb of capacity) 12 Gb of RAM, Screen with 17,3 inches, FHD 1920 x 1980 . I am a beta tester of anothe companies with theis software, by eleven (11) years. So, pal, I made many tests with another pc's or hardare, with more or less requirementes for some games. Ypu eors es very poor. Greeting to yoy
hey supposedly 11 year old, he may or may not have as much money as you (assuming that what you said was true) but at least he can pass a 5th grade reading level unlike some supposedly 11 year old who definitely was a *beta tester for anothe companies with theis software, by eleven (11) years." (your exact words copy and pasted btw) and, if you just ignore this reply, and don't respond ill go ahead, and assume you can't continue a argument when the hate is directed towards you.
4 years ago(-1)
Ok friend, I have noticed that you have written 2 times trying to argue my vote and my opinion regarding your program, let me clarify that I will not change my vote for the following reasons: first, my computer has its 8 cores released, it uses the operating system updated and I have more than 16 Gb of RAM, so I see that your program does NOT work correctly on a device that is designed to run it. So, I have previously evaluated other programs of the same quality that consume less resources and perform more efficiently.
If you want to evaluate my credentials for SUN Microsystems, I will gladly provide you with my data, because as I mentioned, I have been working in the field of programs and applications for 11 years, and I have a master's degree in programming and computing from the University. If I want to reserve my anonymity, it is for personal tranquility and comfort, but if you feel threatened by my criticism you can ignore it and continue developing your project, even so, if you DO NOT correct the errors in your program, my rating will remain exactly the same And if you are in this environment it is for you to do evaluations of your program, correct? then, either you correct the errors or else support the evaluation. But if you do not accept the evaluations it is your business, I only warn other users of the poor quality of your product, because I remind you that if you present this on a commercial level, you are selling a fraud. Have I been clear? So please stop the comments and dedicate yourself to correcting your program or increasing efficiency. They are my best wishes to you. Atte, Ing. Alexander Hetliegen
It seems that someone with a master's degree is unable to look at the username of the person they're replying to, and your comment belongs in r/iamverysmart. Oh and one last message to give to you before you decide to type another essay on how you're so cool, and definitely have a super expensive pc,
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo. :)
4 years ago(-1)
Good evening friend, I see that you continue to insist on answering a reply that is perfectly justified, and seems not to understand how programmers and beta testers work, and to teach it, see it as a kind of kitchen critic, in the same way that testers work of programs and sotware. How does this work? It is simple, we test on wide range computers, from the minimum to the maximum, from the graphical development computers to the development and calculation computers. YOUR program DID NOT pass the tests, and it was done with various environments, because they conflict, the size of your program does NOT justify its performance. I don't know if this does NOT seem clear enough to you. And these tests are sent online, not through mockery or sarcasm as you want to minimize. The quality of your product is POOR. Low, minimum, with conflicts and bugs in the program. You can be offended as much as you want, that is the reality of things and if I don't do it, someone else will also do it and can try to discredit, but the result will remain the same, and the failure is not of the program itself but because of it. seen from the programmer. That you take the trouble to use an illogical, irreverent and even humorous argument shows your level of maturity regarding the development of your project and only confirms my results, that they do not seem to you is not my issue, because I am not a psychologist but a programmer BETA tester, understand? And you can do the ironies you want if other investors ask me to make an evaluation of your project they can reach the same conclusion and people have the right to see the quality of the product that is being offered to them. If it is a prototype, you must notify: it is a prototype with errors. But you did not do such a thing, and still offer it as a complete product, what is that called? at the criminal and legal level it is called fraud. Take responsibility for the quality of your program and dedicate yourself to programming better than you criticize. Unlike you if I have to demonstrate my credentials, contact my private, by mail, I will gladly pass the supervision office and I will gladly tell you about the failures of your program Line by line. If not, do not waste time answering this criticism with malicious words because doing so discredits you and gives me reason. The best friend, is that you correct the errors of your project and undertake a new development. Bethesda Software Company did the same as you in a larger size using 768 mb, how do you justify that your program spends 3 gb and is so mediocre? Laugh whatever you want, the facts are the facts, and the clowns are others, not the testers. Greetings and blessings. Ing. Alexyz Hertliegen
4 years ago(-1)
Good evening friend, I see that you continue to insist on answering a reply that is perfectly justified, and seems not to understand how programmers and beta testers work, and to teach it, see it as a kind of kitchen critic, in the same way that testers work of programs and sotware. How does this work? It is simple, we test on wide range computers, from the minimum to the maximum, from the graphical development computers to the development and calculation computers. YOUR program DID NOT pass the tests, and it was done with various environments, because they conflict, the size of your program does NOT justify its performance. I don't know if this does NOT seem clear enough to you. And these tests are sent online, not through mockery or sarcasm as you want to minimize. The quality of your product is POOR. Low, minimum, with conflicts and bugs in the program. You can be offended as much as you want, that is the reality of things and if I don't do it, someone else will also do it and can try to discredit, but the result will remain the same, and the failure is not of the program itself but because of it. seen from the programmer. That you take the trouble to use an illogical, irreverent and even humorous argument shows your level of maturity regarding the development of your project and only confirms my results, that they do not seem to you is not my issue, because I am not a psychologist but a programmer BETA tester, understand? And you can do the ironies you want if other investors ask me to make an evaluation of your project they can reach the same conclusion and people have the right to see the quality of the product that is being offered to them. If it is a prototype, you must notify: it is a prototype with errors. But you did not do such a thing, and still offer it as a complete product, what is that called? at the criminal and legal level it is called fraud. Take responsibility for the quality of your program and dedicate yourself to programming better than you criticize. Unlike you if I have to demonstrate my credentials, contact my private, by mail, I will gladly pass the supervision office and I will gladly tell you about the failures of your program Line by line. If not, do not waste time answering this criticism with malicious words because doing so discredits you and gives me reason. The best friend, is that you correct the errors of your project and undertake a new development. Bethesda Software Company did the same as you in a larger size using 768 mb, how do you justify that your program spends 3 gb and is so mediocre? Laugh whatever you want, the facts are the facts, and the clowns are others, not the testers. Greetings and blessings. Ing. Alexyz Hertliegen
