Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+10)

Are you saying you want minor's on a discord server for a adult game?

(-16)

I mean, discrimination is discrimination

(+8)(-1)

Okay so is it ok to take Minor's to strip clubs?

Or get alcohol at the bar?

Or is that still discrimination?

(-18)

Yes? Very obviously? It's the same as banning people of a certian race from places

(+9)(-1)

Are you a pedophile? 

Because you are really trying to justify having children in places they might/will not be safe in.

Why do you want children in places where they aren't safe?

(-13)

How are they not safe?

(+7)(-1)

there is noncon stuff in here they shouldnt have that normalized at there age even if it is just a game

(+2)(-1)

it still screws up their brain 

(+1)(-4)

So gta normalises heists and murder?

(1 edit) (+2)(-1)

there are literally study's proving that porn messes up developing brains

(+1)(-2)

you are a effing weirdo, get mental help

(+1)(-11)

its a furry game not strip clubs an alchohol

yall seem to think censorship when it comes to minors exists because it ruins their purity and not that theres valid concerns for their safety and vulnerability when it comes to minors entering those spaces

its the my kid vapes and now theyre gonna become a terrorist mentality

(+1)(-1)

You do know you're defending a pedo, right?

(+1)(-2)

no

(+1)(-1)

Ok pedo

(+1)(-1)

idk man

(-4)

I'm not? I prefer people older than me and I simply want other people to have that right

(1 edit) (+2)(-1)

Yes, you are. You're saying older people should be allowed to groom minors just because you find them attractive.

(+1)(-3)

It's grooming in the same way that smiling is manipulation

You know what? I'm done talking civilly to you. People like you who defends pedophilia should've met with smartschoolboy9.

(+5)

This is not about maintaining purity, this is about protecting them from potential predators or those that have no problem with verbally or emotionally abusing those that are online in these spaces. This is about allowing children to be children and not placing them in environments that will cause them to grow up faster than they need to because that type of trauma stays with them for decades. This is about keeping children safe in a way that those that were around during the AOL era were not because people don't always trust the right people and can be taken advantage of.

(2 edits) (+1)(-7)

if we keep them from places where they can learn whats wrong theyll be more likely to become traumatized and scared when they actually find people who want to take advantage of them thats how minors do get groomed and molested most of the time its because theyre confused and dont know whats going on

i fucking hate analogies but can we introduce fire so that they learn not to get burned or are we jus gonna feign ignorance and be surprised when they show up scarred

my brother actually was molested by my uncle as a kid and nobody knew anything about it until a few weeks after and we just found out hes been diagnosed with severe anxiety -maybe it wouldnt have happened if he knew that it was dangerous

(+7)

That is actually really fucking stupid, you're unironically suggesting we expose minors to predators bc "Well how else are they gonna learn??"

(1 edit) (-1)

no actually

that is not what i was suggesting

(+3)(-1)

Are you saying minors should be around predators, so that they can learn from experience? Are you perhaps mentally challenged?

(-1)

ok so what i said was we should let minors play furry games and what you heard was we should let minors be around predators

im pretty ignorant so id love to meet someone who met a predator here and that person prob isnt u

(+2)(-1)

That's not what you said, Mr. Pedo. Go and reread your own comment before trying to gaslight me. You're clearly suggesting minors should “learn from experience" in your previous comment.

(-1)

can i get a quote

(+1)(-5)

just saying for my closure but flamespecter who wants to protect minors from nsfw content and godwyn noodle who thinks minors should be treated equal actually have moral reasons behind their arguments and not stupid hate that people spew just so they can giggle and jerk themselves off at their short lived righteousness

dragged this out for too long im tired asf 

its not black and white u cant keep minors safe by cutting off their arms and legs so that they cant fight make sure they know whats right and wrong so if something happens to them they can ask for help and if u dont then u cant let them out of the house these ppl of all ppl should know the worlds not unicorns and rainbows

im not gonna die on this hill so not gonna come to this thread again and im gonna sleep peacefully

(+2)(-1)

Sure buddy, just remember, 300 yards away from any school zone

(+6)(-1)

"You are too young to stay in this porno game." That's what you are considering discrimination? Keeping young minds away from things that they shouldn't know yet?

(-9)

Why gatekeep stuff from someone for something they can't control?

(2 edits) (+6)(-1)

Maybe because their minds are in a completely different phase of development and they don't need to be interacting with adults in sexualized spaces you fucking troglodyte

(+1)(-6)

They said the same thing about women before they could vote

(+7)(-1)

No they didn't dude, this is about porn game communities not civil rights. They quite literally aren't mentally developed enough to be effectively safe from predators till abt 18, thus the literal law.

(+1)(-2)

It is still segregation, and making this sort of thing so "tabboo" will only make people, I'm saying people even if you don't seem to think they are, more curious and more vulnerable

(+4)

there is no way ur not a child and thats why ur defending this so much 

(+1)

This ^

(-1)

He's also said "I'm begging you, don't the straights have enough games, let us have at least something" word for word on a game. So, he's presumably heterophobic, when the majority of furry games are based on LGBT+ representation and M/M, which he has many comments on M/M games, which disproves his point with the notion that the "straights" have a lot of games.

WHAT KIND OF REPLY IS THAT??? ik they would figure it out or hear from somewhere but, THAT'S NOT HOW GATEKEEPING WORKS! THAT SOUNDED MORE LIKE YOU WOULD ACTUALLY LET YOUR YOUNG CHILD WATCH PORN LIKE IS COCOMELON OR SOMETHING.

(-3)

I mean, it's probably higher quality than coconelon so yeah 

(+2)(-1)

i dont think thats what discrimination means

(+1)(-2)

"treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit." age is a catagory

(1 edit)

You are either a ragebaiter, a pedo or a kid, that's my conclusion in my opinion.