Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+2)

Oh that game is vile. That is not in dispute. It has incest. I understand the appeal. Same as for the blackmail and non con plot devices. Forbidden fruit and all that. Possible in fiction, but not in reality. In short, pulp smut.

Steam actually did not remove the game. The developers pulled it. I linked to their statement. The game did not violate any of Steams rules for adult games. Otherwise Steam would not have allowed it on the platform in the first place or pulled it after legit allegations. But the allegations were not legit. You need to pay $ 100 to publish on Steam and they do not accept barely started games. They do have a look before allowing something to be published. It might not be a very scrutinizing look for quality, but they do look out for bad apples. It is big news if Steam has to pull a game after publishing.

Your gloating just reveals the issue I mentioned above. The activists picked an easy target. Easy win. Activists happy. What will be their next target? And that they picked this and used fake evidence to rile up their mob indicates to me, that this was not about the game itself, but about other goals. Like binding their followers and getting new ones.

gloating? buddy I'v never heard of the game before reading your post... you admit the game is vile, so why would you be surprised if it's taken off a platform? I got no horse in this race, just thought it was telling that people are defending a disgusting game. how do you reconcile, "the activists won" with "the devs pulled the game"? Not even the developers thought they should post the game? (truly asking this iv never heard of this particular situation before)

(+1)

Are you ok that fake evidence and bullying was used to fight a game? Yes? Then you can laugh (as you did XD) and I will call that gloating. 

No? Then you would also "defend this game" as I did? I voiced me not being ok with how the game was attacked and I argued against the points that were used to justify trying to ban such games. Those points were not true when used against the fps I played decades ago. They are not true now, even if it is "a vile" game.

I suggest reading the statement from the developers I linked to, and how they see their game. It will answer your questions.

(+1)

I don't know, man... I don't think I would ever defend a game that has rape, porn, and incest as it's main themes. If the dissentors are using their freedom of speech to "bully" (your words, not mine) the devs to not post their game, then maybe the devs had their minds changed. 

Deleted 145 days ago