I found the above table hard to read. What I really wanted to know was the language breakdown in raw count and percentage form. So, I took the data above and did my own quick calculation:
| language | entries | % (rounded) |
| guile | 15 | 31 |
| fennel | 10 | 21 |
| clojure | 5 | 10 |
| cl | 5 | 10 |
| racket | 4 | 8 |
| elisp | 4 | 8 |
| s7 | 3 | 6 |
| kawa | 1 | 2 |
| owl | 1 | 2 |
The various Schemes are all significantly different enough to be considered their own languages.