24 entries were submitted between 2019-04-08 07:00:00 and 2019-04-18 07:00:00. 141 ratings were given to 27 entries (100.0%) between 2019-04-18 07:00:00 and 2019-04-28 07:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 5.4 and the median was 5.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #18 | 3.357 | 4.333 |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #21 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #22 | 2.840 | 3.667 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #22 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #22 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #21 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #21 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #22 | 2.840 | 3.667 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #24 | 2.324 | 3.000 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #25 | 2.324 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #22 | 2.530 | 4.000 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #23 | 2.530 | 4.000 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #24 | 2.530 | 4.000 |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #24 | 2.214 | 3.500 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #26 | 2.214 | 3.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #3 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #24 | 2.400 | 2.400 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #25 | 2.400 | 2.400 |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #26 | 1.800 | 1.800 |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #26 | 2.200 | 2.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #24 | 2.214 | 3.500 |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #24 | 2.214 | 3.500 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #26 | 2.214 | 3.500 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #27 | 1.581 | 2.500 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #27 | 1.897 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #22 | 2.582 | 3.333 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #24 | 2.324 | 3.000 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #27 | 2.066 | 2.667 |
| How strongly maps are integrated in the game’s design | #27 | 1.291 | 1.667 |
| How well the game fits the theme and goal of the jam | #27 | 1.807 | 2.333 |
