Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
A jam submission

A square killing random squares in a squareView game page

A square killing random squares in a square. That's about it, seriously
Submitted by BobMcBob — 29 minutes, 44 seconds before the deadline
Add to collection

Play game

A square killing random squares in a square's itch.io page

Results

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Authenticity (Use of resolution restriction)#3442.2613.750
Gameplay#3551.3572.250
Overall#3581.3572.250
Graphics#3601.2062.000
Audio#3650.6031.000

Ranked from 4 ratings. Score is adjusted from raw score by the median number of ratings per game in the jam.

Did you work in a team?
1

Was the resolution a challenge?
Nah

Leave a comment

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

Comments

Submitted

A neat game idea, and I really liked the changes in the smiley face as my health went down. I don't think I quite grasped how the game was supposed to work, though. Sometimes if I pressed up it went sideways to kill an enemy, and sometimes I wasn't able to move because I was boxed in. Pretty fun though, nice going!

Submitted(+1)

Nice game! But it was really hard to figure out where all the files are because I think you sent the entire project by accident in which it was the wrong project. If anyone wants to play this game, you need to go through Sqaures-killing-squares > OpenGLTemplate > OpenGLTemplate then there should be the game squares. You then need to copy and paste that into bin > Debug because it needs the right dlls. What would really help with the game is there be a menu sort of button. Because it was borderless, I had to close the game from task manager. Maybe some audio would help as well? :D

Submitted

Just as a heads up to anyone trying to find the correct application, it's three OpenGLTemplates in (Squares-killing-squares\OpenGLTemplate\OpenGLTemplate\OpenGLTemplate). Two levels in gives you 'a guy killing random slimes in the dungeon', which I don't think is the intended version :)