itch.io

Thank you very much for giving your take to my question, I appreciate it. :) I've decided I'm probably a Ravenclaw upon giving it more thought.

Nothing is inherently, indisputably bad or good-- morality requires constant dispute to stay true and valid.

I'm not sure I understand what this means. Does it mean nothing is just right or wrong but there must be a reason that explains it (and we must find out what that reason is) or does it mean that whether things are right or wrong depends on what we decide rather arbitrarily?

I'm asking because I'm quite sure I might be Ravenclaw Primary but out of the two possible meanings of this sentence I could think of, I agree with the first one, the second one makes me angry because I know things are objectively right or wrong for a clear reason that is beyond what we might make of it subjectively.