I think your an idiot lol
just because I could read between the line before I see the recontextualization doesn't mean I'm wrong. weird mental gymnastics there.
to me it seems like you brought into the fact it was consented and for some reason cant stand you were wrong went back to try and find things I was wrong about and only found no tears in one scene.
now your saying because I was right early I'm wrong ??????
1.this "declare consent" bullshit. something happens you don't agree to is the definition of consent. what ever mind tricks your doing to convince your self different is weird and what rapists use a excuses.
2. even if it not intentional he still made people believe something that wasn't true. not because it was the right thing to do or because that's what he believed but just to stop everyone arguing and ensure they get along XD . while it might not be a "perfect definition" it fits pretty close. given all the talk of nuance you seem to proclaim I don't understand how you don't get that.
3.again I'm not assuming, he literally is repressing it and MULTIPLE comments are made about it not even gonna bother trying to tell you different its in the script.
4. this isn't real life sighting some rendering flaw as a reason is dumb and even then in the flashback which would of been made further into development small details like this are more likely to be added. Basically the fact its even put into the flashback shows it means something.
and how the hell can you know he's not scared with all the talk about knowing what inside some else head I don't need to be told he's scared its just a normal logical reaction to the situation.
I don't know why you cant just accept the fact he didn't consent. all the talk of gaslighting and you trying to get me to believe something that isn't true...
oh the irony XD