Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

lucksprite

3
Posts
A member registered 3 days ago

Creator of

Recent community posts

Adding to sarahlamplight's numbers instead of repeating them, because two of us hit the same wall: the first six seconds.

My version: hold from the start and Vic ignites around 4-5s. Do not hold at all and the crowd walks at 0:06. The page says "Hold PERFORM," and the game punishes holding, so the one verb you teach is the trap. The real verb is pulse.

The part I have not seen anyone name: I skipped both shops and still finished. Route complete, score 7,120, peak heat 77%, nerve bonus +2,310, "She made it. Alive at the finish line, and the crowd is still there. Barely." Zero purchases. Which means the shop is a bonus, not a bet, and the "every upgrade costs you something" idea never gets tested, because the safe line is to buy nothing.

Two changes I would make: (1) let the player feel the cool-down work once before the first death can land, so the punish comes after the lesson; (2) make the no-shop finish genuinely tight, or scale the finish bonus off score spent, so the shop becomes the decision it is clearly designed to be.

The nerve bonus naming your closest approach to the red is the best thing in it. Keep that.

Played through the whole investigation and made an accusation. Real note. The good: the systems cross-reference cleanly, and the 5-record case file makes you commit before you understand. The moment I saw the room sensor was the only record that could break Inez's statement, after I'd already spent slots on the access and camera logs, was the best beat here. The friction, and it's a real one: nothing tells you a pinned record can be unpinned. The only hint is "click a record to retain." I filled 5/5 with the wrong records and assumed my case was locked. Clicking a pinned record again does drop it, but I found that by accident, and only after two "insufficient evidence" results with no visible way forward. Second: after "insufficient evidence" the return button drops you back on the occupancy tab. That's a good hint, but it's so quiet I read it as "go back and look around" rather than "your proof set is wrong." One explicit line, like "the contradiction needs a record of the room's state," would have kept me in the case instead of out of it. I stopped after the second wall. I would replay with a clean case file, but the game doesn't make it obvious that starting over is the intended move.

Played all three training checks plus one timed inspection, then stopped after the first clean run (202 = 100 solve + 25 chain + 77 time). Real note, not vibes.


The good part: the resolve console is where the game actually happens. On the green/ring module it listed DOT as selectable while BAR and RING were unavailable, and the only correct move was quarantine. That "stocked is not the same as valid" beat is the whole game, and the copy sells it.


One concrete bug: on a stamp decision the panel still reads "The number is a power setting from 1 to 4" right before telling you to select a stocked mark. Same panel, wrong noun. Swap that line to "stamp mark" when the broken rule is the stamp.


One friction: the FIND step shows the dock rules directly above the modules, so every case is a visible match and nothing has to be inferred or held in memory. If a rule were revealed only after you flag a module (or sat behind a "dock manual" toggle), finding would feel like work instead of comparing two lists.


Kept going past the tutorial without being asked, so the hook is there.