itch.io

1) Tale of the Viewer.: (QUEST)

 Looking at a physical reality model, for example r.q.f. theory, the model leads to the imagination of changes in different fields, caused by effects on scales nearly unimaginable by a human. If some object, like a star, is encapsulated and reviewed along such theories, the star looses energy when it spreads field effects, while collecting them leads to the opposite. 

Even if the content or position of the star changes, the process keeps working, while, depending on real reactions, the effects change. It can be seen as a huge, organized System, where large field areas are kept nearly identical over huge time scales, even that they exchange their content and translate to other positions. Same review can be applied to other objects, for example mountains on earth or some pieces of metal. Some patterns keep their order on huge timescales. 

 Now, to best of my knowledge, none of these objects is thinking about itself, or about its reality, nor the universe which it is included in, nor does it host a viewer which could interpret. 

 Along the same model, certain organization of patterns, special bandwidths of field configurations over a certain area, which continuously exist for some time, altering within acceptable tolerances, definitely host a viewer. It is thinking about itself, about it's surrounding reality and the universe which this viewer is included in. 

Humans may host such a viewer, under usual conditions, somewhere behind their eyes. Transformation, Translation, sub organization of encapsulated field effects, the Energy of the viewer's Body - all may change - possibly even fully over time. However, the viewer itself, who realistically was generated by certain pattern configurations of physical fields, or may was placed inside them, is sometimes able to hold up a connected reality over a longer timescale. Imagine what that viewer is. May another Person, sitting there viewing? But that is a paradox. To best of my knowledge, no physical model can or will describe this viewer. You are simply magic! 

PS: Yes, I think there is: sensor streaming. dynamic filtering. linked stream combining. sub processing algorithms. neuronal networkS. storage cells. temple bindings. many more ... dynamic result processing (your viewers nD Cinema, wherever it happens to be processed). However, if we built a machine, it could maybe learn walking, talking, may even acting as any surrounding human, but would it generate its own viewer at some point, simply by copying all such principals? To me, the viewer remains a transcendent mystery. 

 Can you break this philosophy? Meaning, can you state, exactly, logical, what the 'viewer' is? Also consider the question: When does nature start to generate a viewer? So, I don't think, a tree has its own 'viewer', but does it? I don't mean answers like 'stimulating waves, leading to brain regions getting active unordered, and consciousness is alive'. What is the viewer?

 I offer € 16,18 (sixteen Euro and eighteen Cent) for each of the first 7 pretty good answers, I receive (email(private) or forum(public)). (or the total money which is left over from the 7x for really resolving the question)

2.1) Tale of Time (Tale of 'Greg').: 

... Look, which date do we have? On the year scale, it is quite strange - 365 (or 366) days are split into 12 months, having either 28 (or 29), 30 or 31 days. The 'rhythmic' follows a principal, where the 2nd month has 28 (or 29) days; The 4th, 6th, 9th, 11th have 30 days, all others have 31 days. If we think about weeks with 7 days, which are running unsync to months in most cases, it shows a high complexity, compared with the 'simple' question to separate a year into smaller timescales. The complexity originates, firstly from the approximated number, 365, secondly from shifts (leap years & larger timescale fixes) caused by the fraction, resulting from counting the earths rotation around the sun in days - It's not synchronized this way, uncomfortable for our simple view.

... Now, if we look at the mission, separating the year, we could also use a different system, which may is logically easier - we know we need 'shifting days' anyway, so we can define our system with special days (not usual weekdays, call it e.g. 'Venuday', 'Marday', 'Mayday' or whatever). Those are usually used to correct un-synchronicity, but let's use 'Venuday' as the fixed last day of the year. So, a usual year would hold 364 days + 'Venuday'. (opposite-direction-of-hell-day, Venus, the 'hell' planet with twisted rotation). 

Any 4th year, after 'Venuday', there comes 'Marday', as first day of the year. Like in Gregorian calendar, all 100 years, instead of 'Marday' a 'Mayday', meaning, in that leap year, there is no 'Marday', the 'Mayday' will usually not take place, just being a real calendar day each 400th year. Most people never know this honor, looked that way, swung that vibe, felt how it sounds, to be the viewer of a real 'Mayday' date - ... . 

 New days can be stacked to fill larger scaled incorrectness.  Now, let's look at our separation - we are left with 364 days, where we want a sub system, so we get a year which is easy to understand. We can use 28 days each month, resulting in 13 months per year or 26 days leading to 14 yearly months. If keeping our 7 days week scheme, using the system with 28 days, the weeks run in sync to the month switch, so the 1st of each month will always be e.g. Friday - Maybe the week system was implemented based on this moonshine of history. 

 Similar to the previously described system, the amount of 'Venudays' (call them whatever), can be increased, for example 5 'Venudays' - Now this results in 360 remaining days to be separated. As this value can be divided well, using its prim factors (2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5), a lot of possible Systems are imaginable. Days and months could be organized like 20*18, 24*15 or 30*12(!), the week system could be kept (not monthly sync), or be a factor of days per month(s) for sync. My Dream is a 6 days week, 2 days free. Yes, we can! Exterminate Monday! 

 ...

Does it decrease user intelligence if the user's daily systems are perfect? Does perfection about yearly sub structures even more lead to some 'running in my hamster wheel' complexes? To me, the current system is acceptable, tradition is preferred over a small efficiency improvement, if it's not required.

 ................................................................................................... 

 Story sharing.: 2.2) Tale of Time (Tale of 'Ur').: (QUEST) 

 ... Look, what time is it? Our day time system is possibly the oldest unchanged schemantic still in use. Why was it engineered in the way we use it today? You heard something about the good factorization, 60 has good factors (2, 2, 3, 5), or 24 hours per day (2, 2, 2, 3), making it possible to split our day, hours or minutes into different fractions straight forward. Why exactly those numbers were used is historically unclear, the base 12 system is often provided as simple answer. But how was it really created and why these numbers?

 ... 

 I offer € 24 (twenty-four Euro) for the first correct answer, I receive (email(private) or forum(public)).

4) Tale of 'Devil's Number'.: (QUEST) 

You heard about it from friends, have read about it. Often it was displayed in television with either religious context or there was some kind of show master including it in his show, emotions like he knows about it. If you keep looking deeply in all of their eyes, you see, they don't know what it means. 666, the devil's number. 

The religious influence originates in older manuscripts, for example in the bible, it is used in the Book of Revelation (13:18) as name of the antichrist. ""Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is: Six hundred threescore and six" (666)". 

In math, 666 is a triangular number, produced by summing the values from 1 to 36. One could argue for: 'Apocalyptic Numbers', 'Apocalypse Numbers', ..., while all cases somehow look quite random in relation to a 'devils number'. 

Nowadays, if you played roulette, in a casino, you played with the devil's number, as 666 is the sum of the values (1-36) of the playing table. May it was designed with influence from chinese culture, where 666 stands for: "everything goes smoothly", I mean, for the casino side, at least. 

Wouldn't there be a smoother answer? Is the message behind these older manuscripts, that someone who thinks about this logical reality, the plain number 666, is a devil? Malicious tongues might claim, it shall imply, that generally, people who think, are mad. Realistically, it was just a nice number, with its catchy triangular ability, all digits same value, trinity at its best in base 10, in other systems, it's unspecial. 

... But wait a moment, could it be? Could there be something else, something so extremely strange, in any human sense seen completely sick, surrounding you silently, directly implied by any possible description of your life and environment, base of natures language, where the magic is six-six-six? Similar to Goethe's Mephisto, can we state: "Mephisto is (/666 is) part of that power which would. The evil ever do, and ever does the good."? 

... I offer € 162 (one hundred and sixty-two Euro) for the first correct answer, I receive (email(private) or forum(public)). *You can also communicate just a part of the answer, privately, which illustrates the know-how, without even(ly) letting me know your full picture :)

Please make sure you have Windows (Windows 11 was tested) and Chrome installed locally.

Download the file FlowTube_*Installer*.exe to your Windows file system and run it (e.g. double click) - Follow the instructions in the installer.

If you meet any issues during software usage, please:

• share the logs (/YourUsername/AppData/Local/Flowtube/logs/*.txt) in any bug report (e.g. as zip). 
• for issues releated to the app interface, please attach a related screenshot

Have a nice FlowTube!