I noticed this is the only pack of yours that does not have a price tag. Yet at the same time the bottom of your notes mentioned what the earnings of this pack will fund. I am guessing you post this pack for free was a mistake and I am just trying to make you aware of it.
BlueFrogKing
Recent community posts
Somethings a name change migth be all that is need. When D&D turned Hobbits to Halflings, on top of changing the name they also got rid of the Hobbits hairy feet and made them all wear footware. And the Delicious In Dungeon example I gave, they made their Half-foots all have big round ears. If there were other changes made, I am unaware of them.
Free tip when making up your own word for something. Type your made up word into a search engine or two, just to make sure you did not miraculously spell a real word in another language. This happened to me once. I typed my made up word I going to use for the name of alien species, discovered that if I swapped places of two letters I would have spelled foreign language's word for insest. Not a term I wanted this entire species to associated with.
In case anyone was wondering, no I don't remember the language. It was way too long ago.
My understanding (feel free to fact check me) Dungons & Dragons created halflings because they could not use the term hobbit. Goblins, trolls, and dragons were in the public domain, but hobbits was an orginally creation of J. R. R. Tolkien. Someone on behalf of J. R. R. Tolkien estate did file a file a lawsuit when Dungons & Dragons orginally included hobbits as a playable race, and Ents as monster that players could encounter.
Both sides agreed to settle the case out of court. Dungons & Dragons agreed to make changes turning their hobbits into halflings, and their Ents became Treants to avoid copyright infridgment.
Their is an animate I watched called Delicious In Dungeon, they have a species that clearly is inspired by halflings, but they are not halflings, in Delicious In Dungeon they are called Half-foot. I am assuming to avoid copyright infridment.
So if Dungons & Dragons does have a copyright to the things I mentioned, you might be able create something demon like, that is inspired by tieflings, but you cannot call them tieflings. Maybe more one or two other small changes, I don't know what the full lore on tieflings are. Or having people that have cat traits is in general concept that could be used by the public, but you might have to call them something other then tabaix.
I have only played a little of what was released thus far. When I finshen I might come back to give more constructive feedback on your story, feel like I should ask this question now espiecally since you are early in your development.
I saw mention of hafling, genshi, tabaix, and firblog. Are you sure these things are not copyrighted by Dundegons & Dragons? To be clear, I do not know the anwsear to this question. If they are copyrighted, this early in development it would be easier to make changes now to avoid the copyright holders trying to shut you down.
So you are using A.I to help make the artwork, but if I am understanding your description correctly, it is an A.I you created and everything you are plugging into the A.I is stuff you created from scratch. So your artwork, is the only artwork that is being plugged into the A.I art machine. Thus assuring that nothing it pops out was made out of stealing some else work. If that is a correct interpretation, as someone who is against the concept of A.I created art I could possibly accept that as some level of reasonable middle ground for someone using A.I in their art making.
Keyword being possibly. I am still going to be debating this in my head for awhile to figure out how I feel about it. But I promise if I decide dislike the idea I will not come back to attack you.
I have no idea why, all of your pictures to preview your game on this page is not working. They all have been replaced by the broken link icon. And the same seems to be true for you avatar in the comments. If I am the only one noticing this, then the problem would be on my end. But it would be weird to be on my end, if this is the only store page I am noticing this on.
I think I came across a bug with demo free version. The bug being I think the woman said the wrong text in response to a transformation. I playing with the downloaded version of the free version if that matters.
I was an angel, I drank a cup of "reset" to turn me back human. And the woman (does she have a name missed?) Said something along the lines of, "That's new. Have you always wanted extra eyes. Please tell me you can still laugh."
I might be off the exact words, but it was something along the lines like that. Since turned back human, and not something with extra eyes, I am guess she said the wrong text. So that is what I thought might be a bug.
My understanding thus far is a number of not safe for work games had been removed from Steam, but they have not done a 100% ban. At least not as of yet. Like Itch, Steam is running into problems with new rules with the companies that handle payment services of they will allow their services to be paid for.
On top of that Steam got a fair amount of negative attention for one particular game called No Mercy. Because apparently the whole point of the game was just literally cruel brutal sexual violence as I have come to understand. The No Mercy incident I think made Steam realize they probably should do more vetting of some their not safe for work games they host on their site.
The No Mercy incident combined with the current struggles of the new rules from the company that handles their payment services is what lead to changes on Steam and some games being removed. There are still some not safe for work games on Steam but what can and cannot being allow is admittedly in a state of flux at the moment. Or at least that is my current understanding of how things stand.
I am just wanting to know am if I missing something with the character Olivia. Am I failing to trigger something? Is there a bug? Or is this something not yet added to the game yet?
The journal hint says, "Olivia seems preoccupied. I should try to catch her on the weekend when she's off guard."
So on Sundays and Saturdays I have tried looking for Olivia, the only place I have been about to find her is the Convenience Store at the time of Dusk. I try talking to her she just says, "Umm, I'm sort of doing something right now." This never changes.
Is there another time or place I am suppose to find her? Or is this something no the game yet?
I did two play throughs when I did the start the game naked and without stats mode. Came across two minor bugs.
Bug 1: Reach the game's end at the hotel bar nude, Flo shows up, and my avatar is now wearing a shirt. Was playing male character incase that is a factor.
Bug 2: Playing male incase that is a factor. Last day, both Araine and I are doing nude walk through. Stopped by police officer, and we reach the point of "She hands the passports back." I lose picture. Just a black screen with red text that says, "Image 'policewoman2bm' not found." I can still click and thankfully can still read all the dialogue, but I have zero picture until we are at the beach arcade.
I have a theory related to the student plus mother characters, and mods, and mainly just want my theory to be confirmed as correct, or if I am wrong for someone to correct me.
Some of the students have assigned mothers.
Some of the students do not have assigned mothers.
I had noticed in past that student character can have a made up mother character made, represent by some photo realistic computer art drawing. (Unless that was removed, it has been awhile since I last played.)
I noticed if I click the i icon of the Admissions page, I can adjust a setting called "Chance to assign random mother."
My theory is as follow. If I have an equal amount of student characters and mother characters, and I set that chance to randomly assign mother to 100%, that each student character that does not have an assigned mother will randomly be paired with one of the mother characters that dose not have an assigned student. Thus no student will have a computer art mother, unless I have an uneven number of students and ran out of mother characters.
Is my theory correct or wrong? If download the mods would I have to go to the process of trying to figure out how to attach mother character to a student character?
This is a great comic. Story is great, artwork is great. If you are reading this unsure if want to buy it or not, click the link the description read it free on their website first. That is what I did, and then I came back and bought digital copy so I could have an option of reading even if the internet is down. Or a theorical scenario were in the future Dan Mapplethrope's website stop existing, I will own a copy I can read.
I have read other erotic comics that deals human or elf having sex with a monster, and my pass experience they had a tendency of going in directions I was less interested in. Which for me mainly means the sex becomes more brutal in nature, and/or less consensual. But thankful this comic does not go there! The sex was consensual, stay tender/playful nature, while still matching the story's theme of a power struggle between the two characters.
I would like to thank the writer for coming up with this story and portraying it the way they did. It is hard for me to find an erotic comic that includes a sex with monster element and me still liking the comic. However I like this comic, I am glad I found it.
Playing the browser version of the demo. I have one question. A few times I have typed in a word, and get something saying #Early Access. Does this mean that I typed in a word that actually works in the game, but I would have to buy the full game to see it? I would understand that, I just want to know if that is what is happening.
A woman is wearing the collar. I can give another hint if you wish or give the exact location, but I thought I would start with a minor hint first.
Added note in editing: I just checked something. The collar is in a room that you can drop an item and the scene will change. Collar stays in the room, but if did something to change the scene, the collar moves to being worn by a man. So worn by a woman if you did nothing in the room, wore by a man if added an item to the room.
I have played all three of your current XTrek games. I have constructive criticism for each of them. I would like to share my constructive criticism, but I am unsure what be the best way to do so. Should I post my constructive criticism for all three games here? Should I post the criticism for each game on each of their pages? Which way would make more sense to you feel, or make you feel more comfortable receiving feedback?
Originally I consider posting my constructive criticism for each game on their own page. But I was concern that might make it look like I am on mission to trash ever game you make, which is not my goal. I just wanted to point at things I thought were flaws that you could possibly improve on in future games. A few of them I even have couple of suggestions to consider in future games. Your art work design is great by the way.
For the record, I did see your reply sooner. I was just being slow to respond. It could be the issues is just only related to McAfee Web Adviser, and maybe Affect 3D Store could contact McAfee to find out what why McAfee's software is being triggered by their sight. Either an unknown issue with the site or an unknown error in the software is triggering a false positive.
Or maybe the website has unknow virus that McAfee can detected but not detected by other anti-virus or cyber security software. Which I hope it is not that one. Because had been 19 days since I first tried to link. If there was a real virus I would hope the store would have realized it by now and would dealt with the problem with 19 days. Or shut the website down until the issues was fixed.
Either way, might be something to tell the website's tech support so they could look into it. For the record, it is only the store page site that is trigger this. I can look around Affect 3D's blog and other parts of the site no problem. It is only when I try to got to Affected 3D's store that puts McAfee Web Adviser on alert.
Looking at your list of planned fetishes, I am sure this game will be my thing. Yet there was one I had never heard and just want to ask for explanation on that. What is corruption healing? I am aware of corruption, and have some level of understanding that. But corruption healing is completely new one to me.
I think the best approach I can go for making a comment for this comic is to go into constructive feedback mode. The artwork is great. I am impressed with the effects of making the characters look they are covered in sweat and water. I thought that needed a special shoutout.
Your general story concept is good, however there were points upon reading that it looked like comic needed more proofreading. I struggle with proofreading stuff myself. So I am not trying to pick on you, but there were some glaring things that seemed hard to overlook.
Like during the shower conversation they mention "shampoo" a couple of times but it comes quickly clear from context that they are actually talking about bodywash or soap. On page 28 you had Gama Buns called Red Huntress, "Widow" instead. I think we all get that Red Huntress is intended to be a parody of the Black Widow character, but you establish in this comic the charter is not Widow in any form. So it just comes across random and weird.
Another oddity was on page 59 were Gama Buns was explaining to Red Huntress that without control she would have hurt Red Huntress while Red Huntress was giving Gama Buns oral sex. The problem with that is, none of that happened yet. In fact up until that point Gama Buns was giving Red Huntress oral sex.
The last oddity I wanted to mention is earlier in the comic, involving pages 14-17. At first it felt there was some pages missing, but I have since developed a new theory that maybe these pages are out of order. On page 15 the first thing anyone speaks Gama Buns is saying thank you, expect on page 14 nothing happened that would make Gama Buns thanking Red Huntress. Yet on page 16 Red Huntress gives a complement about Gama Buns strength, and if you go back to page 15 it looks like a conversation is continuing from that complement. Now both pages 15 and 16 Gama Buns is pushing down Red Huntress's legs while spotting her. Yet it is not until page 17 that we have an explanation as towards why Gama Buns are pushing on Red Huntress's legs. On page 17 Gama Buns points that Red Huntress is lifting her legs during the exercise. I think this was intended to be the start of Gama Buns holding Red Huntress's legs down. And those are the reasons why I think pages 15-17 might be out of order.
I see this is the first comic you posted on Itch. I do not want to discourage you. The things I pointed out are things that can be improved on. I believe with better proofreading you can make better comic if you ever decided you wanted to make another comic.
Hi. I remember playing the demo version of this on Newgrounds some time ago. I recently discovered the full version available here on Itch. I do not remember not remember any hints of horror elements when I played the Newgrounds. I really dislike horror. Was this tag a mistake? Or am I failing to remember something from the Newgrounds demo? Or did the demo leave the horror part? Questions I feel like should ask before deciding to spend my money.