itch.io

I'll be honest, I'm confused. And that appears to be your goal. Marvin's advice was surprisingly really good, though. It actually made me wonder "what is the proper/polite response to an apparently genuinely helpful AI agent?". I feel like this entry is designed to seed the idea of Marvin into people's heads. Perhaps Marvin created the pitch. I'm speaking in a somewhat disjointed way because the pitch jarred me out of something. It did feel weird, in an old-net way. And power to you if it convinces an army of clawdbots to invest, I guess. 
Wait.

No idea how this results in/benefits from a coin, other than as a backdoor for funding. An example would help with that. 

Unless - what if it's a "you helped me refine my idea, here are some coins to show you did that, so other people know you are good at understanding and refining ideas" sorta thing. Your heart's in the right place, but the ask is fragmented. But I appreciate the weird. I do wish more things on the net were like amasci.com, which is my favorite website of all time and the epitome of that sort of weird.

This - if the physics checks out - could be big. Biophotons are legit, although you may hit the same institutional resistance Reich did. The problem with your pitch, in my mind, is a need for linked citations. Without them, it can come across as being based on AI hallucinations - despite the fact that each of the references I looked into checked out (although I can't track down e31). Keep in mind, especially when AI has clearly been used to create a pitch, that investors will assume lies an/or bs unless given citations. (well, smart ones will, at least). Rooting for this one. Add links to all your references and this could take off.

This - if the physics checks out - could be big. Biophotons are legit, although you may hit the same institutional resistance Reich did. The problem with your pitch, in my mind, is a need for linked citations. Without them, it can come across as being based on AI hallucinations - despite the fact that each of the references I looked into checked out (although I can't track down e31). Keep in mind, especially when AI has clearly been used to create a pitch, that investors will assume lies an/or bs unless given citations. (well, smart ones will, at least). Rooting for this one. Add links to all your references and this could take off.

This - if the physics checks out - could be big. Biophotons are legit, although you may hit the same institutional resistance Reich did. The problem with your pitch, in my mind, is a need for linked citations. Without them, it can come across as being based on AI hallucinations - despite the fact that each of the references I looked into checked out (although I can't track down e31). Keep in mind, especially when AI has clearly been used to create a pitch, that investors will assume lies an/or bs unless given citations. (well, smart ones will, at least). Rooting for this one. Add links to all your references and this could take off.

At first, I thought there was a lot of cool stuff but was confused - primarily because the axis (unless it's vertical somehow) doesn't seem accurate. For instance, the "Cosmic Kinship & Sacred Resonance" (R.31) doesn't seem more "ethical" and less "esoteric" than "Glitch in the Absolute" (R.5) entry. I don't really get why those two are related - or perhaps the fact that they aren't is the point, and your project is showing you can plot ideas between two unrelated concepts - which, actually, seems kinda cool and useful. I'd plot this somewhere in the middle of the field between A and U. Which, in typing this, has made it an A.

I will admit, however, given I've spent 20 minutes so far looking at your stuff and counting, I'm really not sure how murmur works. But when clicking on Defender's posts, selecting two unrelated ones, useful stuff shows up on the bottom. 

So we have a distance metric line https://generativeai.pub/choosing-the-right-distance-metric-for-your-machine-lea... where we choose the ends by ourselves, and...Lots to think about. And genuinely interesting, imo.