itch.io

Fine, I will leve there's here, but I would like to point out the way that this commenter labeled these articles:

"The horrors of 'gender affirming care' exposed by a case manager at a transgender center" - spoken by a person who never even seen firsthand the care that was being provided. Again, a case manager is not a professional in the field, but a bookkeeper. 

"Study by American College of Cardiology linking hormone therapy to greatly increased risk of heart failure" - funny to mention heart failure when the paper literally never says heart failure is a side effect and explicitly stated that no deaths were linked to any of these increased risks. Funny how people who try to oppose trans healthcare always use emotionally charged and scary language to try to prime readers with a negative viewpoint when the body of the article doesn't even say the things they allegedly show, rather than just letting things speak for themselves.

Everyone is entitled to talk about their own personal experience, but to use that as a way to try to prevent anyone else from receiving treatment is at the very best irresponsible. Detransition rates are less than 1%, and for comparison I will leave this here: https://www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(18)31067-0/fulltext#:~:text=Results%20combined%20the%202%20top,the%206%2Dweek%20LCSS%20evaluation. This is an article talking about the 13% regret rate of cancer patients undergoing chemo, but we wouldn't use that as evidence that we should ban anyone from receiving chemo would we?