It is an awesome game, honestly! It's just, like, the perfect PbtA Homestuck game for which I was looking all the time!
I just wanna a couple of... clarifications or explanations, I think?
1) There are no any advice or guidelines about how to GM such a game as SBURB session in the book. Can you give such an advice?
2) There are no GM move triggers. It is obvious that GM makes move on a player's move miss, but... there isn't any more triggers?
I hope that you'll answer these questions, because the game is just sooooo cool, like, as hell and I wanna run it or maybe suggest running it to my friends! U~U
First off, I'm glad you like what you see! I hope it's as fun as it sounds.
Your questions are interesting. I'll take a crack at them.
1) I didn't provide much about SBURB as a game because the sessions we follow in-story are all described as outliers. That said, if I wanted to hew a little more closely to what we're led to believe is a "traditional" session of SBURB, I'd probably steal the idea of Progress Clocks from games like Blades in the Dark. For instance, I might progress a "Death of the White King" clock at certain story points, or when players fail to avert certain forms of trouble. Similarly, I might break the process of entering the session into a clock based on its key steps (i.e. Install Sburb, Deploy Devices, Alchemize Entry Item, and Prototype Sprite [once or twice]), then allow the actual entry to proceed at the pace that drama demands. The process of building up a tower and sufficient grist to help create a Universe Frog would also be a clock (or maybe one clock per player). That sort of thing.
All that said, if your players are familiar with Homestuck already, much of that stuff could be glossed over in favor of them chasing shenanigans in the course of broadly-stated goals.
2) The GM Principles should guide you in when to use your moves, but in general "Threaten trouble, individually or massively," "Impose an obstacle," "Hint at secrets," "Take something precious," and "Offer something the players want or need" are the moves you'll use to prompt players to act. "Follow through on a threat," "Reveal the truth," "Mark a connection for a player," and "Advance the clock" are moves you'll use to acknowledge/reward/respond to player actions. ("Mark a connection for a player" could use more clarity--it's intended to let the GM give out free connections to encourage cool stuff and power up players in ways that help the story). The remaining GM Moves are more focused on scene-setting and plot progression/expansion, and are good for when the current scene is more player-driven or has nothing in particular going on.
Of course, if you use Progress Clocks as suggested above, the timing for a lot of GM Moves would become more obvious. In fact, it'd be fair to add a GM Move of "Set a Progress Clock," or maybe something more SBURB-appropriate like "Reveal a Countdown."
Hope these help!
Thanks for answers a lot! I didn't even thought that you check comments here and such. It is good to be mistaken, hehe.
1) There's some really good advice, but I was asking mainly about... how to run such a game, assuming that SBURB mostly about singleplayer exploration of the Land. But party has multiple players, so... How to manage spotlight between them and how to make things that affect multiple players at the time? It'll be good to have some knowlegde about it.
2) So it's basically making moves at misses and when nothing's going on?
Ahh. The answer to both questions is "PBTA systems are more player-driven than most systems." The consequences to most moves build their own drama, ideally, so the GM's main job is to set the tone, present situations, roll with the consequences of players' moves, and fill out the world with new stuff.
You might want to talk with potential players about what they want out of a game--if they want detailed singler-player exploration of their Lands, great! You can plan out some interesting locales. Play-by-post might be better for keeping that manageable/engaging.
But if they want the Homestuck experience--haphazard exploration regularly interrupted by shenanigans, game-breaking exploits, and text- or voice-chat conversations--then that's going to be a much more free-wheeling game. In that scenario I'd recruit my players to come up with ideas about the session, or even try the round-robin GMing approach so that everyone get to contribute equally.
Hmm... That explains a lot of things! Thank you for your answers and thank you for your game! It seems that this game really could translate the *feel* of Homestuck more than any other Homestuck tabletop game I've seen, what is absolutely awesome! :33
I'll definitely try run the game as my concerns about it are solved.
Oh, by the way! Do you know of any actual plays or you know, player/GM experience of the game? Just curious about how other people played it, if any.