Hey, as I said, I’m fine with the disqualification—and I certainly understand it, too.
I actually meant for this to be a fun post; it’s just that spinnyflame146 apparently felt so offended by it that he got drawn into an endless argument.
Viewing post in My game was rightly disqualified, and yet I find it a shame.
i am not offended by by a single word , you just think ur the main character in this game jam , and u think that if i didnt report u wich is the the right thing n u would be the winner , stop yapping bro,or should i say the AI that wrote the response is YAPPING?RULES ARE RULES , now get lost or ill report u another time
You know, you only become the main character if the audience gives you attention.
Just look at our discussion—you’re the one adding fuel to the fire here; if you hadn't replied to my post at all, it would have just faded into obscurity anyway.
Reporting the game is totally fine, too, but it fits perfectly with the way you present yourself here. You feel compelled to report a game because you see yourself as a know-it-all cop, and you have to jump into every pointless argument because you apparently think you're always right.
I’m not even trying to claim I’m right in this whole discussion; I never even said the ruling was wrong. The only thing you keep saying in response is that "those are the rules"—well, Sherlock, that’s true, and I’d already realized that!
I just hope you aren't like this in real life, because accusing someone of using AI without any grounds—simply because you don't like the other side—isn't exactly classy behavior.