Okay, I respect that... I never actually claimed the decision was wrong, nor did I use AI—no idea where that idea came from. Oh, wait—maybe it's because they use AI for game covers themselves...
for the record, I didntt use ai and I dont encourage using it for game development ,this is about u breaking the rules by making your game 26 days early then changing your story to 2 days after getting disqualified dont deflect by accusing me of something I didnt do That chatbot style response of yours gave the game away, am done with this conversation
It’s funny how you claim the conversation is over for you, yet you keep right on going.
Look, the IndieDB page shows it quite clearly; a Google search for the game brings up various sites explicitly listing June 20th—even Google’s AI overview gives June 20th as the release date.
If you want to get a kick out of having caused a game to be disqualified, then CONGRATULATIONS.
At no point did I question the disqualification or doubt its validity.
The only thing that makes me happy is knowing that my game was either so good that you felt compelled to get rid of it, or it wasn't actually that good—but you’re just such a boring person that you feel the need to report things like that.
Judging by your use of commas, we at least know you aren't using AI—though you probably should be, considering how diligently you already use it for game covers.
It’s funny how you just don't grasp that this whole discussion is completely unnecessary! At no point did I call the disqualification decision wrong—or whatever else—but you’re making a mountain out of a molehill.
Play a round of RED KITE and everything will be fine!