forgive my blind eyes for not looking enough. ai "art" is still one of the worst forms of generative ai either way.
But the art in this one is actually pretty good. It still takes time to get AI to produce art that isn't messy, inconsistent garbage, and frankly I don't see the creator of this game anywhere actively trying to hide the fact that this game was made using AI or deceive people over it. Like I'd get it if they were in the comments actively deceiving people trying to act like the art is 100% legit but they're not doing that; not only that but they have an additional notice in their own description about the AI assistance, beyond just the AI-label in the tags field which is required by Itch.
So they are very open about using AI to help with the art, they at least put enough attention into it to make sure it's GOOD art, and everything else was made by them which suggests they're just someone who wanted to make a game and couldn't make the art for it. Where do you see such a big problem in that scenario?