Brother, the comment you are responding to is over TWO MONTHS OLD. God damn, you guys just HAVE to argue with people regardless of how old a post is, huh?
AI "art" is not art, period. Humans make art, not machines imitating humans. Plus I myself am an artist, but I don't believe I've yet mentioned that because none of you really care about who's arguing what, you just wanna express the sentiment of "AI IS GOOD DUDE".
Also yes, I will be dismissive and disrespectful to stupid people with stupid positions that don't actually care about said positions. That is what y'all deserve - being disrespected and dismissed.
Why should I bother finding another hill when this one is perfectly comfortable? You idiots can't argue for shit as evidenced by the literal months of you losers attempting and failing to do so. Maybe take your own advice - or don't, either way, 'cause again, it's not like you clowns really believe in anything other than jerking off. Go ask Grok to undress someone underage or whatever it is you lunatic-freaks do.
Edit: That last statement might suggest that I'd prefer people ask their demon-robot to undress kids rather than annoy me, but the opposite is true - I just wasn't thinking of how that could be read, so that's my bad. What I meant was that all AI users are, at best, supporting a machine that creates CSAM and that the poster I was responding to should stop replying, I just kinda ended up jumbling the two general ideas together, but it's also not like the people reading this either care or are capable of reading well enough to decypher the potential meaning of the statement in question, so whatever, read into it however you like.