Hey, I ran those commands in Terminal and got the exact outputs. Confirming I also followed the same steps you outlined; I downloaded the dmg file after paying the $2.99 and it took me to a link where I downloaded
UWUVCI-V3.200.6-Mac
I used chatgpt to also help troubleshoot, and it suggested this. Let me know if this helps.
The Wine binary itself looks correct (file and otool -L match expected output).
However, the crash report shows macOS is executing Wine from /private/var/folders/.../wine, not directly from the app bundle.
On macOS 26.2 (Apple Silicon, Rosetta), dyld aborts with missing LC_LOAD_DYLIB even though libSystem.B.dylib is present when inspected in-place.
This looks like a translocation / runtime copy issue with Kegworks on newer macOS rather than a malformed binary.
What’s actually happening
This is a macOS 26 dyld regression / enforcement change:
-
otoolconfirms the binary does link libSystem -
dyld is still rejecting it at runtime
-
This happens before Wine even executes
In other words:
The binary passes static inspection
but fails runtime validation on your macOS version
That’s why the dev can’t reproduce it.
The subtle smoking gun in your crash report
This line:
Process: wine Path: /private/var/folders/*/wine
That means:
-
macOS is not launching the Wine binary in the app bundle
-
It’s launching a temporary extracted copy
-
That temp copy loses Mach-O metadata when dyld revalidates it
This is a Kegworks / app translocation issue on newer macOS.
Why only you (and newer macOS users) see it
macOS 26 added stricter checks when:
-
Executables are launched from translocated paths
-
Or copied into temp folders at runtime
-
Especially under Rosetta
So:
-
winein the app bundle = valid -
winecopied to/private/var/folders/...= rejected
Older macOS doesn’t care. New macOS does.