I'm not going to disagree about the description. That could've been easily done by hand.
My point is about the code side of things.
Using AI for that is in no way different to using Stackoverflow. Heck, most of the AI's "knowledge" comes straight from there. And copying a code snipped teaches you as much as asking AI to insert that same feature you googled for to get to the Stackoverflow page. Not to mention that not everyone's goal has to be to learn programming.
As for artwork or other creative content, what harm does it do? Someone's going to lose his job because this person used AI for an indie game? You think they would've paid an artist for the images, or an editor for the texts? No, the game just wouldn't have existed. You can complain about big corporations using AI to replace people, but that's not the case here.
As long as you're open about using AI and don't try to replace paid labor with it, who cares? They're just reducing the amount of time they put into this. That's nobodies loss, is it?