Pretty sure you need to go see a therapist as you sound like universe ended just cause someone used ai art in a free porn game to save money 😆 being human centric doesn't mean one should cater mediocrity, I've seen some artists ask excess price for Mediocre arts and sometimes deliver even worse than that on whims because there were no other options, ai arts instead made easier for both devs to make games in a budget friendly way to earn more money and free players to get good games for free, so I see no problem in it as nobody got obligation to spend more money than they needed to just cause someone thinks they're entitled decide for others 🙄
I'll actually read through and fully respond to your post when I have more time, but I fully expect you to be repeating the same. Exact. Drivel. That all you AI-cultists use to justify relying on your machine-god - "dude it saves money using this society-corrupting machine that also turns our planet into trash, that's all that's important, just serve the great machine of industry, dude, all else is unimportant, dude, just sell your soul to the machine for it's all-powerful slop, dude, nothing else matters except making money because we're just simple little cogs in a machine, dude" because that's all you AI-cultists are - slaves to a hypothetical "machine of progress" rather than valuing art and knowledge for it's own sake, or even doing anything with yourselves outside of stealing from other people because you're too lazy and uninterested in participating in said mediums of creativity and expression.
But please, keep on responding to me with the exact same points I've seen a thousand times over, at least this is keeping you from using your machine-god for a little bit longer. Hell, go ahead and toss my points into ChatGPT if you're so uninterested in actually having a discussion in the first place, but just know I'll be the first to end this whole thing because you can't hold it without getting bored despite initiating it in the first place - it'll just go to show that you're not capable of finishing what you started, alongside revealing how little you care about your points.
So what you're saying is that there's not actually any point to responding to all of your arguments because you care too little to actually engage with them. About right, that mentality is exactly why things are the way they are and AI datacenters are currently running through the planet's limited water and other various resources, but I notice you haven't taken the time to respond to that or any of the other arguments I've taken the time to apply, just the bit about you not liking AI artwork.
God, you're inept. Learn to read and think a little critically more than what you're currently doing. I promise it's not hard, you just need to use the tiny, underworked piece of meat in your very thick skull for a smidge longer than what you usually might. Hell, it might even do you some good.
Note how I'm trying to keep this relatively short, and that's for your sake - your attention span is something that also probably needs to be worked on.
Yes AI Art uses drawing styles etc from other artists, but so do reallife artists as well? Its all about inspiration. So if AI "steals" styles its an act against humanity but if an artist "steals" styles its completly fine. You need to understand, good artists will ALWAYS sell, bad dont. Art has always been a rough business and AI is replacing all those mediocre artists with skyhigh prices.
Apart from that, its also a way for the not so creative people, to express themself in art and try it out for themselves. Many people also use AI as inspiration. It doesnt always have to be AI vs Human. We can coexist and learn from each other.
You idiots definitely aren't capable of holding your attention for longer than a couple seconds on any one topic letalone the multiple paragraphs I've been writing up, so I'm not even going to bother making cohesive arguments. I presume you at most probably just threw everything I've been writing into a chat-bot to summarize what I've been saying anyway.
Go clean Sam Altman's boots with your tongue somewhere else.
Actually ive been reading a bunch of your comments and i get your idea. You are an arrogant narcisist who calls other people out, despite being hypocritical in each and every post you do. You say others dont change their mind, they are in an "AI Cult" and everyone against you, profusely uses AI, while you dont give anyone else even an inch in a dicussion. Dont worry man, the day will come when realitiy hits you in your face because you are just a keyboard warrior :)
That's one way to call the kettle black, bud, but I'm not taking the bait, because I really don't actually care what you think and trying to give you any kind of explanation as to why I'm arguing what I'm arguing is entirely pointless even if I did care.
All you clowns can do is whine and cry about how "you won't change your mind! You're an arrogant narcisist! Boo-hoo! You won't change your mind despite my crying about technology that steals other peoples' art and wastes resources!"
Again, go clean Sam Altman's boots with your tongue somewhere else.
If you'd read through any of my comments to a meaningful degree, you'd see how I consistently claim "I don't care what you think" - so then, why would I give a shit about the little updoots if that's true? More often than not, I'm getting 1 downvote for every upvote, so the idea for that statement to be true is null and void. Who's comments are you reading, my guy?
No, instead of caring about what any of you morons think, I used to argue in this thread because I actually enjoyed arguing, and while I still do enjoy getting to insult you total losers, I can also be doing other, more interesting things, so I've kinda just moved on. You are the one who responded to me to bring me back to doing it, but I'm still having a good time watching idiots like you grasp at straws while I get to tell you and yours how stupid you all are, because I like doing it.
Anyway, all of what you've said thus far just goes back to the pot calling the kettle black. Go whine about those who speak against your AI god somewhere else.
Ok so this is exactly the thing I was talking about - you don't actually care about art whatsoever, but I also directly addressed the things you're saying here in one of my other posts that I've made. But apparently if something is too long you just won't read it, according to your other comment, so I'll try to make this short and sweet as possible for your goldfish atttention span to keep up with.
I'd suggest going back and reading all of my posts, but with the amount of effort that requires out of you, it might actually just end up directly killing you, so I'm unsure if I'd actually suggest that.
My reasons for not liking AI are actually complicated, so I suppose if you're too incapable of reading something that's "too long", you might need to just go back to preschool for another decade or two.
If you're going to skip through an argument, generally you should pick and choose wisely, as my "whining" actually included points against what you were saying, (and then some) but you wouldn't know that outside of what little you've been able to absorb, but don't blame yourself. I imagine AI is what actually raised you instead of human beings.