Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(4 edits) (+1)

I cited an official statement coming from DOJ. It doesn't add up that the DOJ wants to release something, that is labeled as nonexistant by the DOJ...

"Hell, if you trust the DOJ so much, why did the fire the head prosecutor on the Epstein case and grant Maxwell partial immunity?"

That's a question only those who did can answer you. But webbing conspiracy theories isn't helping anyone.

Btw. are you serious about this airplane point? You think a vehicle can't change owner and become somebody elses property, if it was property of some different, awful person beforehand? Are you for real? A vehicle has absolutely nothing to do with some individual! It's just a vehicle! A tool, to move around! I would be absolutely comfortable with it, if it's my property. It would be different, if it was Epstein's property. But it isn't. Why should it be a problem to buy and use an airplane? Do you burn your favorite songs music records or BluRay movies, after some artist is exposed as bad guy? Sorry but that's just riddiculous nonsense...

And have you missed the point where Trump banned Epstein after a victim spoke out and made Trump aware about what Epstein did? He didn't excuse this or defended Epstein. No, he banned Epstein and spoke out against him. He canceled his friendship with Epstein.

And besides all of this, lets just play your game and assume that this list does exist. So, if Epstein wrote names somewhere, does it mean that those people he wrote down were clients for rape scenarios? You think that's actual real evidence aka proof for anything? A name list? It just shows he wrote down people's names. Victims speaking out and giving clear and specific details of what happened are another story. Or video recordings aka real evidence. But a name list? So if somebody awful writes down your name somewhere for example, does this mean you're a bad person then? Does this prove some connection with you or things you have done? Is it actual proof for you being guilty of something? No, it isn't... Real evidence is another thing, as I said before. And if there is evidence, it should be used to jail offenders. But that's the point. Only actual real evidence counts.

(1 edit) (+2)

he literally just appointed convicted pedophile Lawrence Taylor to his youth sports initiative lmao. 

Edit: listening to music from a cancelled artist is NOT the same as flying around in a plane you bought from a pedophile that he used to assault children in. 

(3 edits) (+1)

"he literally just appointed convicted pedophile Lawrence Taylor to his youth sports initiative lmao."

That's nothing to laugh about. That's just awful :(


"listening to music from a cancelled artist is NOT the same as flying around in a plane you bought from a pedophile that he used to assault children in."

Oh really? What about R-Kelly music then? And you're wrong on this point. These both are just goods. Art or vehicle, it simply doesn't matter. Actions of previous owners or artists aren't connected with goods. The people who did those horrible things are to blame and that's it. An airplane is just an airplane and nothing else.


Edit:

I've got an important detail into my mind.  Did Trump knew this detail about Lawrence Taylor, when he appointed this dude? If he knew it, then there's no excuse. That's just disgusting then. But if he didn't knew this detail (I mean nobody knows any single human on this planet) then the situation looks a bit different. And if he didn't knew it and heard from others about it now, he absolutely should act and end this cooperation with Taylor. But you can only truly blame him for this if he knew this detail. Because only then, he did this willingly, while knowing what this dude had done. But if he didn't knew, you can't blame him for things he didn't knew. Because then, his intention wasn't bad. 

(+1)

He definitely knows. If you’re choosing someone for such an important position you would know they are in the sex offender registry, that would come up in any background check. 

(+1)

"He definitely knows. If you’re choosing someone for such an important position you would know they are in the sex offender registry, that would come up in any background check."

Do you have proof about Trump having done a background check on this guy? Or are you just making this up? So far I saw only accusations but saw no actual evidence as proof for those accusations.