we're getting into super-generalisation territory here so lets stay nuanced, this is my interpretation here:
the left brought up over-sexualisation, so corps marketed to them. uglification is a psy-op to divide us and make the right believe the left wants to erase attractive women completely, whereas the left im apart of is all about self expression and inclusivity, which STILL INCLUDES conventionally attractive people. and the fact "uglification" is a word is the reason why people call them porn addicts, cause it creates the impression that they cant handle when someone isnt a total smoke show. i never said it was only christian conservatives either, i believe its also radfems and puritans, whatever side they're on. its an abolishment of over-sexualisation, which does affect women when it promotes unrealistic and harmful beauty standards. and lastly, i for one believe that its about inclusivity and universality, body type A/B is objective with no room for interpretation. If i was the leader of the hypothetical woke hivemind, it would be for the medium to include more diversity; keeping BOTH, not erasing one for the other. the corps that make these decisions are the ones picking one or the other because it fuels the culture war and divides us further instead of reaching a rational compromise.
neither the left nor the right are the ones making the games, they're just the markets the corps try to profit from.
and one last anti-generalisation statement here: ive seen plenty of people on the left who are fine with hot people existing, and ive seen you who isnt against porn either, so stop trying to make this a left and right issue. folks like you and me from both sides who are fine with porn arent the ones in control, clearly.
i could go futher into a conspiracy theory if you want, but i'll end it here. we're arguing about the wrong things at this point and unfortunately its a spectrum so no one label is all encompassing.