Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(2 edits) (+15)

Although I am not an NSFW game consumer (not yet at least ;)),this makes a very valid argument, especially the part about NSFW games funding other, SFW projects. Even though it's not a game, it reminded me of the story of Nagatoro-san; the mangaka started initially drawing doujinshi, and then switshed to more SFW stuff, even if Nagatoro-san is still on the edgier side of things, and look at it! It's become a very well known and respected (maybe) manga and even got itself an anime adaptation. 

Even if some poeple go too far, I trust the NSFW game community and the porn connaisseurs to self-regulate themselves, and create a healthy and welcoming ecosystem.

I think that taking away this launch pad for creators and home for consumers, is a net negative for the online community as a whole.

(1 edit) (+10)(-11)

Though I do want to make clear that I find games like No Mercy  not ok and that the people who made it should probably have the tip of their penis papercutted and that it is very refflective of the hostility that women have to face both online and in real life today. 

However, from what i've seen, it has been greatly blown out of proportion.

And even if it was just as horrible as people were saying, nuking the entire adult game genre for a few sick fucks seem excessive to me. 

Moreover, claiming that companies like Mastercard or Visa are endorsing these games by hosting monetary transactions for them and are thus benefiting from it, even though it maybe represents one pico-percent of their yearly income is disingenuous and unrealistic.

I don't want to pull a perfect-world-falacy here but the answer to me seems to "just" be harder moderation if we don't want games like this, though that would require companies like Steam to actually give a fuck about their consumers...