I'll agree that by and large GE is fairly vanilla, but it does include some activities which are likely to hit the triggers from this whole push going down. Namely a lot around landlady and her boss (rape), the kidnapping (rape), the bully (drugging/assault), the restaurant girl (reverse *rape*/coercion). From the perspective of the story-telling, it is presented in such a way as to make it clear that these things AREN'T positive or good. But, these rules aren't looking at context since the major pushers behind it want a zero tolerance policy.
I get that zero tolerance is a common tool for addressing unacceptable behaviors, and it can help discourage those who are looking to engage in those activities under the cover of "acceptable" excuses. But, it just seems like a situation where the line of discourse and action between victims, advocates, businesses, accomplices, innocent actors, perpetrators, and abusers gets really skewed or blurred until individuals NOT engaged in actual abuse get swept up in punishment while abusers slip past since they were already prepared for the backlash.