Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+1)(-1)

So, this is the second time I've had to write a review about this "game", but just in case anyone reads this:

1) I wrote a review for this "game" before and it was deleted along with the original link for the "game". Whether this was to correct the issue I brought up last time or to cover up my review, I don't know.

2) This isn't a "game" per se: it's an exercise in identifying how low a bar can go for something to be identified as a game. You don't need to read the poorly-written story to figure out how the victim died; you can just click and un-click the buttons until you get 100% correct. There's no music, no visuals, no punishment for guessing repeatedly, and no reward for completing it aside from a link to another site. 

3) In my original review, the site redirected to a charity in India (maybe; or, it might've been a fake charity meant to collect financial information) and never to the site it was meant to. In this "new" version of the game, the website redirects to nothing because it times out when it takes too long to connect. 

Do not waste your time on this.

(-1)

Thanks for your comment. I don't really agree with your definition of what makes a game but I appreciate you took the time to play. The link works fine for me; it provides more context to the project.

Some observations and criticism: 

1) So, in the interest of fairness, I went ahead and replayed the "game" and went to the website (wronglyaccused.agency, for anyone who'd like to skip straight to the site), and Bitdefender detected suspicious activity; "it is not recommended to continue browsing this website". Gee, I wonder why.

2) The trailer (?) for the game looks nothing like this sample game here (actually, it looks slightly different from the showreel of the game posted on elomelogames' YouTube page a year ago, but I assumed that was because games evolve during their development, and that's normal). It's a 3D, first-person exploration game with investigative elements (I guess), so I don't know why you wouldn't show that instead of this text-based... not-a-game. (For those curious, the trailer is available for viewing on YouTube: "Wrongly Accused - a futuristic detective mystery game").

3) You still haven't addressed why the previous work-up of the game redirected me to an Indian charity or why my previous review was erased, but I guess that's to be expected. 

(-1)

The game you're referring to is listed on this creator's profile page, so you could have disproved your crackpot theory in less time than it took you to write it out.

It's not a "crackpot theory"; it's my personal experience playing this "game". If there's nothing wrong with it, why am I the only person reviewing it? If you've played it and there's nothing wrong with it, you would serve the creators better by leaving a positive review about everything they did right rather than sit there and comment on the negative experience of another player. Nothing I wrote was untrue, misleading, or false, so what's your real issue with my comment?