Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(+2)(-1)
  1. This is a port of Minecraft Classic to C pretty much, Luanti is just Minetest.
  2. It's a more solid product than Minetest.
  3. It's FOSS (afaik Luanti is as well)
  4. It's codebase is more optimized than Minetest
  5. You can play this virtually everywhere (PC, DS, N64, PS1, SiliconGraphics INDY)
  6. Modding support can do more to the core game, including rewriting the very core of the game.
  7. It's existed longer.
  8. You can join *some* Minecraft servers (Minecraft Classic servers from Betacraft) with this.
  9. It's simple.
  10. The goals are to just make a optimized, portable version of Classic with enhancements, which it does, Luanti/Minetest are full fledged engines, with a very broad scope, too big for them to be seen as "Simple" for the people who want a simple experience.

Deleted 67 days ago
(-1)

What are you talking about.

CPE (Classic Protocol Extension) adds features to make servers more flexable, like more control over player UI, more blocks, etc.

You can make worlds that are sizes Classic doesn't support

It has texture pack support

It's open source

It's on many platforms

It can convert levels from any version of the game to it's own format

It can play on Betacraft Classic servers without a fuss

etc,


The fact you are saying these make it WORSE is honestly baffling, and you clearly haven't actually played it.

I played it for years lol. It's too bloated. I'd rather just play classicube

???

Are you talking about MINETEST or CLASSICUBE?

I thought you were saying ClassiCube is shit because of the stuff it adds.