Deleted 2 years ago
Maybe the parents weren’t creative at naming their twin children?
Serious note: did the “Town Report” button say anything about those being captured and sold to the guild? Whether they spawned that way or were captured from the NPC pool will help clarify.
Hint for a quickfix for the impatient ones? I'm looking at the code but can't see what's wrong...
newbutton.get_node("grade").texture = globals.gradeimages[person.origins] <-- implies there' a missing image?
globals has the atypical in it's origins
var originsarray = ['slave','poor','commoner','rich','atypical','noble']
After the “cloning” bug is fixed, the next slated improvement for the NPC expanded feature is the option to turn them over to the local authorities for a reputation boost with that town.
Trying to make that system modular right now is going to be incredibly tough and involve rewriting half of that feature and creating dummy holds for the base mod for the features they pull from it, and most of the mod’s features tie together in some way. Hopefully that new option will address some of your concerns with the system!
Thank you very much for the response!
I really like this idea of turning captured bandit to authority for a reputation boost rather than turning them for a profit through selling of fulfilling a job order at slaver's guild. Add an extra layer of role playing a lawful alignment in addition to good/evil which is pretty lacking in base Strife.
That being said... hope reputation would matter more in future update, since beside Maple's optional recruitment quest it doesn't matter in base Strife, which make the entire system pretty pointless (and way too easy to farm in base Strive by keep beating up bandit who try to bully travelers). Maybe have it tie back to the town upgrade system in someways you planned to work on in the future if you haven't planned this already?
I appreciate the feedback! Per v.07, Reputation can be spent to "acquire" prisoners that have been captured and are pending execution (via: Gathering in the Town Square > Hold Execution > Either Option (one uses gold, the other uses rep, both require Reputation > 0).
I do plan on having a myriad of uses for it in the future as well, including being able to affect the town's laws/rules to suit your playstyle (ie: a good town, cruel town, perverted town, etc).
The system does jump around a lot. I tried basing it off of the way the vanilla game calculated the bi/homosexual change, but I think it’s far more obvious and triggers more with the multiple changes. I do plan on lowering the chance of sexuality shifts.
Regarding Futa, I do have them considered as males for the shifts (due to the penises) but may change that to allow player choice to toggle how they are considered by the system (male/female). I don’t know how to effectively make a third option on the scale beyond having it considered same the same as one of the ends.
If the partner is futa, move the sexuality to middle? That could work. A futa is certainly more feminine than masculine.
Also, balless futas do not trigger the cum actions (partenr wishes to taste cum, if you cum in mount, it's not registered). It appears as they do not produce cum at all. Why not simply make the "balless" futa have internal balls? Code-wise, the only difference between a balless futa and a futa with balls would be the description.
I responded without actually checking my script. I had already applied a check to apply a base cum production of 1 to Futa without balls, but it was never triggering because of an Or instead of And check in the previous check which was only applying based on the ball size (which was obviously 0).
Fixed in 07.1
Is any consent even need for the taker? As long as the giver is willing and the taker is subdued/tied, everything should be available.
I did try to mess with the code and simply changed the instances of disabled, but it stil didn't work. Weird.
Also, I did really loose all of my cowgirl position files. It shouldn't be a problem to re-create the basics (if you're interested in adding that), but the descriptions might be an issue.
That’s a great suggestion, my biggest hinderance would be the randomly attributed weights the game currently has. With a better and more logical weight distribution, I could definitely see that as a valid option!
I’ll look over the file when it’s posted and definitely credit you with the addition if you are okay with me implementing it. Thanks!
I can’t confirm if standard harem protagonist overlaps, but i’d think it would from the description.
However, it sounds like both of the errors you’re having are actually tied to the fault causing the Cloning issue and not on your side. It can also cause the UI to bug out I found. I MAY have found the fix but am trying to run it through heavy testing to give it plenty of chances to occur before releasing a hotfix.
It should be checking for resistance using the new Resist/Subdue/Tie functions. The cloning seems to have stopped and no further Item ID errors after 30+ battles so HOPEFULLY that’s fixed and not just lying low, so I’ll work on this next time I’m looking at the code to get it fixed for release
So you nailed all the major bugs? Great. Release when?
It's not like you have to fix every single thing. There's no limit to the number of releases/patches/versions anyway.
Those major bugs, yes. As soon as I am convinced that the game is reasonably playable with the new features/fixes, it’s released.
V.07.1 is releasing as soon as possible, but ended up having some extra features added into it as well. It will most likely come out next time I’m around my PC for more than a couple of minutes, but please keep in mind that this is a hobby and always comes after work and my personal life. I try to release regularly, add new features, and squash bugs as you guys report them and I appreciate your patience as I try to deliver something we all can enjoy.
I had this kind of issue too, some versions ago. A clean install of strive for power all the mods fixed this problem for me. Maybe it could fix it for you too.
I think the issue is that Strive can occasionally miss certain lines or code when it's installing/updating mods. It looks like it applied the wearstrapon twice, which is what was cleared on the fresh install.
Definitely let me know if that happens again!
That is a bug that is fixed in the update which should be dropping soon.
For clarification though (for the correctly working updated function):
Just Observe simply runs the Execution Scene, no change.
Hold the Execution provides the option to try and snag one or more of the Condemned using Reputation or Gold, though both require at least a reputation of 1 with the city (it should at least show you as Positive).
_ is too good for them will let you pick a new punishment for the chance to gain reputation with the bloodthirsty crowd. Currently it is recommended to just pick a lower item on the list (they are crueler as they go) than the original punishment, but that will change when you can start affecting the Kindness/Cruelty of the town in a future update.
Not yet. The Execution system is primarily intended to clear the NPC lists and keep it from straining memory, and the “Hold Execution” was intended as a last minute “oh crap, I wanted that person but didn’t get the chance to grab them!” method.
If that is a feature that people really like or want more of, I could easily add in some quick descriptors (ie: The race age name is [beauty level]). Going deeper with a secondary “Inspect” option would involve fleshing out several different systems to give a “purchase a Guild Slave” feel instead of the Event/Scene that it is now. That second option would slate it more for a full, focused feature instead of a quick addition.
I really appreciate that question, feedback, and offer! I don't have anything like that set up at this point as I feel like that would be detracting from the guy who created the game that I'm enjoying tinkering with. Though I do sink a lot of time and effort into the mod, it is still primarily a hobby for me and I don't want to steal any of the thunder from the game authors who are depending on supporters to be able to keep making the games that they put their heart and soul into. Authors like Maverik who make quality games, are willing to still release their games to the public for free, and don't lock their games behind a pay-wall so anyone who wants to enjoy them can play them should be supported.
I have a game project idea I am very slowly working on behind the scenes that I will hopefully get to the point of releasing in the future. If that happens, I would definitely create a method of support. Until then, I hope that you'll support the game's developer financially and support me with accolades and feedback on the mod for now!
nd underized
and; just so its that much easier in telling me what i may have done wrong, here's the godot window too
hope this does much to help you help me, thanks again!