Judge feedback

Judge feedback is anonymous and shown in a random order.

• Very competent realistic assets. There is little evidence of R&D or technical workflow and the project documentation is very brief
• A diorama would have been better to present the assets. There are well made, nothing specific to say about those. The documentation is a bit empty though, It would have been great to understand how you got there.
• Documentation doesn't really help show any research or workflows used in the project. From what is there though, the UVs are a big standout to me on what could be improved. There was lots of unused space, mainly due to the packing of the UV islands. This is because none of the UVs were straightened, so they do not pack nicely. The quality of modelling and textures is quite good, and especially looks good in the documentation renders, suggesting the scenes lighting is not helping present the assets as nicely
• There's some skill here but there's barely any documentation and sadly I don't think it really fulfils the brief. From what I can see there are some nice texturing details but please use your UV space more efficiently, and it is advisable to straighten your UV shells wherever possible.