8 entries were submitted between 2022-05-06 07:00:00 and 2022-05-16 07:00:00. 40 ratings were given to 8 entries (100.0%) between 2022-05-16 07:00:00 and 2022-05-30 07:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 5.0 and the median was 5.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #2 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #3 | 3.467 | 3.467 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #4 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #5 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #7 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #1 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #2 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #4 | 3.360 | 3.360 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #6 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #6 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #7 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 3.640 | 3.640 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #1 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #1 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #2 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #3 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #4 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #1 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #1 | 4.400 | 4.400 |
| Overall | #2 | 3.560 | 3.560 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #3 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #3 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #5 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #2 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #4 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #5 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #5 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #5 | 2.333 | 2.333 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #6 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #6 | 2.236 | 2.500 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #7 | 1.342 | 1.500 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #8 | 2.236 | 2.500 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #8 | 2.012 | 2.250 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #8 | 2.012 | 2.250 |
| Overall | #8 | 1.968 | 2.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #1 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #2 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #3 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #6 | 3.160 | 3.160 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #6 | 2.200 | 2.200 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #7 | 2.200 | 2.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #4 | 3.578 | 4.000 |
| How captivating the tone, feel, and style of the game are | #5 | 3.354 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #7 | 2.415 | 2.700 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #7 | 2.683 | 3.000 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #8 | 1.118 | 1.250 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #8 | 1.342 | 1.500 |
