16 entries were submitted between 2021-05-07 07:00:00 and 2021-05-17 07:00:00. 171 ratings were given to 16 entries (100.0%) between 2021-05-17 07:00:00 and 2021-05-29 07:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 10.7 and the median was 11.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #1 | 4.750 | 4.750 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #1 | 4.417 | 4.417 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #1 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #15 | 3.083 | 3.083 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #16 | 2.583 | 2.583 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #2 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #3 | 4.364 | 4.364 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #6 | 4.273 | 4.273 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #7 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #12 | 3.182 | 3.182 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #2 | 3.818 | 3.818 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #3 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #13 | 2.909 | 2.909 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #15 | 2.818 | 2.818 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #16 | 2.455 | 2.455 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #3 | 3.719 | 4.111 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #4 | 3.920 | 4.333 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #5 | 4.121 | 4.556 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #8 | 4.121 | 4.556 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #11 | 3.216 | 3.556 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #1 | 4.583 | 4.583 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #3 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #4 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #5 | 3.917 | 3.917 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #7 | 4.083 | 4.083 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #2 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #4 | 4.455 | 4.455 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #6 | 3.818 | 3.818 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #9 | 3.818 | 3.818 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #11 | 3.273 | 3.273 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #1 | 4.636 | 4.636 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #2 | 4.545 | 4.545 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #5 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #7 | 3.727 | 3.727 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #14 | 2.818 | 2.818 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #2 | 4.545 | 4.545 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #2 | 4.455 | 4.455 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #7 | 3.727 | 3.727 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #7 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #8 | 3.455 | 3.455 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #7 | 4.221 | 4.667 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #8 | 4.020 | 4.444 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #9 | 3.417 | 3.778 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #9 | 3.317 | 3.667 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #10 | 3.417 | 3.778 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #5 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #6 | 4.091 | 4.091 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #10 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #11 | 3.273 | 3.273 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #11 | 3.636 | 3.636 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #4 | 3.623 | 3.800 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #4 | 4.195 | 4.400 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #5 | 4.291 | 4.500 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #6 | 3.528 | 3.700 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #11 | 3.337 | 3.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #7 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #12 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #13 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #13 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #14 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #9 | 3.814 | 4.000 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #9 | 3.432 | 3.600 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #10 | 3.814 | 4.000 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #13 | 3.146 | 3.300 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #14 | 3.242 | 3.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #6 | 3.518 | 4.125 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #10 | 3.305 | 3.875 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #10 | 3.731 | 4.375 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #12 | 3.624 | 4.250 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #14 | 2.985 | 3.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #11 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #13 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #15 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #15 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #16 | 2.083 | 2.083 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well the game fits with the theme and goal of the jam | #11 | 3.636 | 3.636 |
| How strongly maps are integrated into the game’s design | #14 | 3.455 | 3.455 |
| How elegant the game’s design is | #15 | 3.182 | 3.182 |
| How captivating the tone, feel and style of the game are | #16 | 2.545 | 2.545 |
| How easy to understand and use the game’s rules are | #16 | 2.091 | 2.091 |
